Politics Computer
Jim Chalmers

LaborHouse of Representatives

Jim Chalmers

Member for Rankin, Labor

About Jim Chalmers

Jim Chalmers is the Australian Labor Party member for the House of Representatives seat of Rankin in Queensland and serves as Treasurer in the Albanese government. He has held the seat since 2013.

First elected
2013 federal election, Division of Rankin
Born
2 March 1978, Brisbane
Education
Griffith University; Australian National University PhD in political science
Predecessor in Rankin
Craig Emerson, who retired
Faction
Labor Right

Summarised by AI from Wikipedia, plus our own records. Sources last checked 11 November 2026.

How Jim Chalmers voted

Recorded votes in the House of Representatives since 23 July 2025, from Hansard.

All votes in the House of Representatives
229votes cast
70%of 329 divisions held
0votes against their party line

  1. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026: third reading

    Voting yes supported the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 passing its third reading, which means passing the bill.

    Voted yesPassed 96 to 38

  2. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026: consideration in detail

    Voting yes supported the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 being agreed to at consideration in detail, which agrees with the bill's text as it stands.

    Voted yesPassed 96 to 39

  3. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026: consideration in detail

    Voting yes supported the amendment moved by the member for Kooyong to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 being agreed to during consideration in detail.

    Voted noDefeated 9 to 70

  4. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026: consideration in detail

    Voting yes supported adding the amendment circulated by the member for Wentworth to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026, which was defeated.

    Voted noDefeated 9 to 81

  5. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026: second reading

    Voting yes supported the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 passing its second reading, which agrees with the bill's main idea.

    Voted yesPassed 96 to 37

  6. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026: second reading

    Voting yes supported the amendment moved by the member for Curtin to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 at its second reading, which would add the amendment to the bill.

    Voted noDefeated 10 to 82

  7. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026: second reading

    Voting yes supported the amendment moved by the member for Wentworth to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 at its second reading, which agrees with the bill's main idea.

    Voted noDefeated 9 to 84

  8. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026: second reading

    Voting yes supported making the amendment moved to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 4) Bill 2026 at its second reading.

    Voted noDefeated 10 to 84

  9. Income Tax Rates Amendment (Minimum Tax on Discretionary Trusts) Bill 2026: third reading

    Voting yes supported the Income Tax Rates Amendment (Minimum Tax on Discretionary Trusts) Bill 2026 passing its third reading, which means passing the bill.

    Voted yesPassed 91 to 45

  10. Income Tax Rates Amendment (Minimum Tax on Discretionary Trusts) Bill 2026: second reading

    Voting yes supported the Income Tax Rates Amendment (Minimum Tax on Discretionary Trusts) Bill 2026 passing its second reading, which agrees with the bill's main idea.

    Voted yesPassed 90 to 45

  11. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 3) Bill 2026: third reading

    Voting yes supported the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 3) Bill 2026 passing its third reading, which means passing the bill.

    Voted yesPassed 91 to 46

  12. Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 3) Bill 2026: consideration in detail

    Voting yes supported the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 3) Bill 2026 being agreed to in consideration in detail, which passes the bill as amended in that stage.

    Voted yesPassed 91 to 46

A member can miss a division for many reasons: illness, leave, ministerial duties, being in the chair or a pair arrangement. "Against their party" means at least three quarters of the rest of their party voted the other way; votes where any party split (usually free or conscience votes) don't count. Votes on procedure aren't listed.

We follow Jim Chalmers's Facebook page but haven't seen a paid ad from it yet.

See this page in Meta's Ad Library

Other Labor members of the House of Representatives

Labor spending

Photo: Wikimedia Commons. Party and seat checked against the Parliament House member list on 11 November 2026.