Politics Computer

Parliament of Victoria · Legislative Council · 7 February 2024 · Health

Ambulance services

Voting yes supported a motion that notes concerns about Ambulance Victoria's mobile intensive care services and aircraft fleet, expresses concern about proposed regional MICA cuts, and calls on the government to properly resource the service.

Defeated15 yes 19 no

The question put

That this house: (1) notes that Victorian lives are being put at risk by the ongoing crisis within Ambulance Victoria that has seen: (a) a reduction in mobile intensive care ambulance (MICA) services, including: (i) a drop in the number of MICA paramedics; (ii) large parts of the Victorian community being regularly left without MICA coverage; (iii) a system that is dangerous and badly organised; (iv) low morale and burnout amongst MICA paramedics; (v) a disastrous rostering system; (vi) insufficient funding to pay for shifts; (b) an ageing fixed-wing aircraft fleet and issues that include: (i) shortages in available aircraft due to maintenance; (ii) an overworked and understaffed pilot workforce; (iii) several pressurisation incidents; (2) expresses concern at the proposal by Ambulance Victoria to cut: (a) MICA units from regional communities, including: (i) Bairnsdale; (ii) Sale; (iii) Shepparton; (iv) Swan Hill; (v) Wangaratta; (vi) Warrnambool; (vii) Wodonga; (viii) Wonthaggi; (b) single-responder MICA units from regional communities, including: (i) Ballarat; (ii) Bendigo; (iii) Horsham; (iv) Morwell; (3) calls on the Allan Labor government to: (a) properly resource Ambulance Vi

How each party voted

Members who didn't vote (absent, paired or in the chair) aren't listed. A party votes as one when at least three quarters of its members vote together.

Source: Hansard, Parliament of Victoria. The summary is AI-written from the question and the bill's official summary, then checked; the record above is the authority.